View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Solution Interview | ![]() Product Discovery Wizard of Oz Test | ![]() Product Strategy Lean Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation. | When a new experience would still be too expensive to automate for real, it simulates the outcome behind the scenes. It checks user reaction and value before the technology disappears. | When an early product bet still has too many open points, it brings target group, problem, and assumptions into a single view. It condenses the idea so core risks become nameable. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 2-10 Tage | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-10 Interviews | 5-20 Nutzer | 1-6 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Solution Feedback, Objection List, Validation Notes | Prototype Learnings, Manual Effort Notes, Risk List | Lean Canvas, Core Assumptions, Experiment Backlog |
Tagsno overlap | ValidationInterviewsPrototype | PrototypeValidationMVP | StartupLeanAssumptionsBusiness model |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






