View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Solution Interview |  Innovation Design Sprint |  Business Strategy GAP Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation. | When the product question is unclear and time pressure is high, the method takes a team from an open idea to a testable solution. It connects problem understanding, decision, and learning in one compact format, lowering the risk of spending a lot of energy on a mere guess. | GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 4-5 Tage | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 5-10 Interviews | 5-8 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Solution Feedback, Objection List, Validation Notes | Prototype, Test Findings, Decision Rationale | Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes |
Tagsno overlap | ValidationInterviewsPrototype | Design sprintPrototypeValidationInnovation | StrategyAnalysisPlanning |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
