methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Paper illustration of a branching category tree with a highlighted search path and possible dead ends.
UX Research
Tree Testing
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Purposedifferent
When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-5 Tage1-2 Tage1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
NutzertrafficBased on research questionNutzertraffic
Formatsame
AsyncAsyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Interest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning NoteFindability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IAClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision
Tagsno overlap
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
Information architectureNavigationFindability
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Paper illustration of Experiment Canvas with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
Experiment Canvas
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing
Paper illustration of a Learning Card with four fields for hypothesis, observation, insight, and action.
Product Discovery
Learning Card