View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Smoke Test | ![]() Decision Making Cynefin Workshop | ![]() Product Discovery Fake Door Test |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all. | When problems are unclear, chaotic, or only seemingly familiar, standard recipes fall short. A Cynefin Workshop sorts situations by the nature of their problem and connects them with matching action logic. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-5 Tage | 60-180 min | 1-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | Nutzertraffic | 4-20 | Nutzertraffic |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Interest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning Note | Cynefin Map, Domain-specific Actions, Sensemaking Notes | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision |
Tagsno overlap | ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth | ComplexitySensemakingDecision | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






