View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Design Service Blueprinting | ![]() Agile 4Ls Retrospective | ![]() Agile Sailboat Retrospective |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a service experience is spread across several touchpoints, it brings frontstage and backstage together. It shows where user contact and internal responsibility must fit. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | When a team wants to read momentum, brakes, and risks together, it offers an easily understandable picture of the situation. It makes drive, obstacles, and headwind visible in the same picture. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 0.5-2 Tage | 45–75 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 6-12 | Team members involved | 4-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Service Blueprint, Fail Points, Ownership Map | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | Sailboat Board, Risks, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | Service designOperationsJourneyBlueprint | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | RetrospectiveTeamImprovement |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






