View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Scrum | ![]() Operations Fault Tree Analysis | ![]() Agile ROAM Board |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team needs to work in a fixed delivery rhythm, it stabilizes cadence, responsibility, and feedback loops. It makes collaboration reliable across sprint boundaries. | For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen je Sprint, laufend | 2-6 h | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 (Scrum Team) | 3-8 | 3-15 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Product Backlog, Sprint Backlog, Increment, Sprint Goal | Fault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control Actions | ROAM Board, Owner List |
Tagsno overlap | AgileIterationCadence | RiskRoot causeSafety | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






