View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Scrum | ![]() Product Discovery Assumption Mapping | ![]() Product Discovery MVP Test Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team needs to work in a fixed delivery rhythm, it stabilizes cadence, responsibility, and feedback loops. It makes collaboration reliable across sprint boundaries. | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. | When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen je Sprint, laufend | 45-60 min | 45-75 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 (Scrum Team) | 2-8 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Product Backlog, Sprint Backlog, Increment, Sprint Goal | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking | Test Matrix, Test Plan |
Tagsno overlap | AgileIterationCadence | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






