View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Scrum |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |  Agile Planning Poker |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team needs to work in a fixed delivery rhythm, it stabilizes cadence, responsibility, and feedback loops. It makes collaboration reliable across sprint boundaries. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen je Sprint, laufend | 45–75 min | 2-5 min je Item |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 (Scrum Team) | Team members involved | 3-9 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Product Backlog, Sprint Backlog, Increment, Sprint Goal | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates |
Tagsno overlap | AgileIterationCadence | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
