View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Sailboat Retrospective | ![]() Decision Making RAPID | ![]() Agile Starfish Retrospective |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team wants to read momentum, brakes, and risks together, it offers an easily understandable picture of the situation. It makes drive, obstacles, and headwind visible in the same picture. | In complex management decisions, clarity is often missing about who recommends, who agrees, and who makes the decision. RAPID creates this assignment and stabilizes decisions across several levels. | When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low |
Timesame | 45-90 min | 45-90 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 3-12 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Sailboat Board, Risks, Improvement Actions | RAPID Role Map, Recommendation, Decision Log | Starfish Board, Practice Changes, Experiments |
Tagsno overlap | RetrospectiveTeamImprovement | DecisionRolesGovernance | RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






