View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Sailboat Retrospective | ![]() Operations ALPEN Method | ![]() Agile 4Ls Retrospective |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team wants to read momentum, brakes, and risks together, it offers an easily understandable picture of the situation. It makes drive, obstacles, and headwind visible in the same picture. | With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 10-20 min daily | 45–75 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 1 | Team members involved |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Sailboat Board, Risks, Improvement Actions | Daily Plan, Time Estimates, Review Notes | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | RetrospectiveTeamImprovement | PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






