View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Sailboat Retrospective | ![]() Facilitation Alignment Mapping | ![]() Agile Start Stop Continue |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team wants to read momentum, brakes, and risks together, it offers an easily understandable picture of the situation. It makes drive, obstacles, and headwind visible in the same picture. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 1-2 h | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 4-12 | 3-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Sailboat Board, Risks, Improvement Actions | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | RetrospectiveTeamImprovement | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






