View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile ROAM Board | ![]() Agile Scrum | ![]() Product Discovery Assumption Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When a team needs to work in a fixed delivery rhythm, it stabilizes cadence, responsibility, and feedback loops. It makes collaboration reliable across sprint boundaries. | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 1-4 Wochen je Sprint, laufend | 45-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-15 | 3-10 (Scrum Team) | 2-8 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | ROAM Board, Owner List | Product Backlog, Sprint Backlog, Increment, Sprint Goal | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking |
Tagsno overlap | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | AgileIterationCadence | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






