View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile ROAM Board | ![]() Systems Thinking Intervention Mapping | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Concept Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain. | Concept Mapping arranges terms and relationships in a network that makes subject-matter connections tangible. It fits when a topic needs to be understood structurally rather than linearly. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 1-5 Tage | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-15 | 4-12 | 1-8 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | ROAM Board, Owner List | Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation Plan | Concept Map, Relationship Labels, Knowledge Gaps |
Tagsno overlap | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | ChangeSystems thinkingCapability | KnowledgeConceptsMappingSensemaking |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






