View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Architecture Risk Storming |  Innovation Design Sprint |  Product Discovery Fake Door Test |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify architecture context, options, and consequences in concrete terms. It organizes technical context, alternatives, and consequences. The result is captured as an Annotated Diagram, a Prioritized Risk List, and an Action Backlog. | When the product question is unclear and time pressure is high, the method takes a team from an open idea to a testable solution. It connects problem understanding, decision, and learning in one compact format, lowering the risk of spending a lot of energy on a mere guess. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min | 4-5 Tage | 1-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 5-8 | Nutzertraffic |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Annotated Diagram, Prioritized Risk List, Action Backlog | Prototype, Test Findings, Decision Rationale | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision |
Tags1 shared | RiskArchitectureWorkshopValidation | Design sprintPrototypeValidationInnovation | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
