View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Architecture Risk Storming | ![]() Operations After-Action Review | ![]() Agile Start Stop Continue |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify architecture context, options, and consequences in concrete terms. It organizes technical context, alternatives, and consequences. The result is captured as an Annotated Diagram, a Prioritized Risk List, and an Action Backlog. | After missions or project phases with unclear outcomes, the method makes visible what actually happened and what can be learned from it. It separates course, effect, and causes so experience turns into solid improvement. | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min | 20-45 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 3-12 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Annotated Diagram, Prioritized Risk List, Action Backlog | Lessons learned, Action items, Event summary | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | RiskArchitectureWorkshopValidation | LearningOperationsImprovement | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






