View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Agile Starfish Retrospective |  Facilitation Delegation Poker |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued. | When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low |
Timesame | 45-90 min | 45-90 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 4-12 | 3-10 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Starfish Board, Practice Changes, Experiments | Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements |
Tags1 shared | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam | AutonomyRolesTeam |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
