View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Business Strategy McKinsey 7S |  Team Design Team Topologies Interaction Modes |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | McKinsey 7S checks whether Strategy, Structure, Systems, Shared Values, Skills, Style, and Staff fit together. Organizational misalignments become visible across multiple levers as a result. | When several teams collaborate repeatedly, it describes the right interaction mode for each interface between them. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as an interaction heat map and pairwise agreements. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 2-4 h | Half day |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 3-12 | Team-Leads plus Architecture |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | 7S Assessment, Alignment Gaps, Change Actions | Interaction Heat Map, Agreements per Pair |
Tagsno overlap | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | OrganizationStrategyAlignmentChange | TeamAlignmentCollaborationOrganization |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
