View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Facilitation Decision Jam |  Facilitation Delegation Poker |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer. | When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 60-90 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 4-10 | 3-10 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Problem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, Experiment | Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements |
Tagsno overlap | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop | AutonomyRolesTeam |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
