View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Systems Thinking Current Reality Tree |  Systems Thinking Iceberg Model |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once. | The Iceberg Model separates visible events from patterns, structures, and mental models. This turns a single observation into a deeper understanding of why a problem keeps recurring. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 2-6 h | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 3-8 | 2-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Current Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention Ideas | Iceberg Worksheet, Pattern Notes, Intervention Ideas |
Tagsno overlap | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality | Systems thinkingRoot causePatterns |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
