View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |  Facilitation Delegation Poker |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 45–75 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | Team members involved | 3-10 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements |
Tags1 shared | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | AutonomyRolesTeam |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
