View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Red Teaming |  Agile Starfish Retrospective |  Decision Making Argument Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For strategic decisions with high reach, agreement and gut feeling are often not enough. Red teaming brings deliberate opposition into the situation and tests where a plan breaks under real counterarguments. | When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued. | When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-4 h | 45-90 min | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 4-12 | 1-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Challenge Findings, Risk Register, Mitigation Plan | Starfish Board, Practice Changes, Experiments | Argument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision Rationale |
Tagsno overlap | RiskDecisionSensemaking | RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam | SensemakingDecisionRationale |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
