View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Delivery RAID Log |  Facilitation Mind Mapping |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When a topic is still unclear and too many thoughts surface at once, Mind Mapping creates an open surface for ordering them. It makes connections, subtopics, and starting points visible without fixing them too early. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 15-45 min | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 1-10 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Mind Map, Topic Clusters, Open Questions | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class |
Tagsno overlap | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | BrainstormingIdeasMappingStructureFacilitation | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
