View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Delivery RAID Log | ![]() Operations Gemba Walk | ![]() UX Research Contextual Inquiry |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions. | When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 30-120 min | 1-3 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 2-6 | 4-12 Beobachtungen |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Observation Notes, Improvement Ideas | Field Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain Points |
Tagsno overlap | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | LeanObservationProcessOperations | UX researchObservationContext |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






