View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Decision Making Radar | ![]() Team Design Team Topologies Interaction Modes | ![]() Team Design Spotify Model Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do. | When several teams collaborate repeatedly, it describes the right interaction mode for each interface between them. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as an interaction heat map and pairwise agreements. | When a team landscape has grown without clear grouping, it maps roles and relationships onto the Spotify model. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Spotify model map and action list. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | Half day | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | Team-Leads plus Architecture | 5-15 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action Areas | Interaction Heat Map, Agreements per Pair | Spotify Model Map, Action List |
Tagsno overlap | AssessmentPortfolioCapability | TeamAlignmentCollaborationOrganization | TeamOrganizationAlignmentDiagnosis |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






