View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Radar |  Team Design Team API |  Agile Working Agreements |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do. | When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document. | When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | Half day initial, dann laufend | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | Ein Team plus Stakeholder | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action Areas | Team API Document | Working Agreements, Team Norms, Review Cadence |
Tagsno overlap | AssessmentPortfolioCapability | TeamAlignmentCommunicationService | TeamCollaborationAgile |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
