View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Decision Making Radar | ![]() Architecture C4 Model | ![]() Operations ALPEN Method |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When capabilities, maturity levels, or market positions need to be compared across several dimensions, overview is easily lost. Radar brings different characteristics into a shared picture and shows patterns faster than tables do. | The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes. | With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 1-4 h | 10-20 min daily |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 1-5 | 1 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Radar Map, Capability Scores, Action Areas | Context Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram | Daily Plan, Time Estimates, Review Notes |
Tagsno overlap | AssessmentPortfolioCapability | ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization | PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






