View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations Process Mapping |  Growth A/B Testing |  Agile Starfish Retrospective |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | With a confusing workflow that has many handoffs, the method makes the actual process visible. It shows where work is passed on, delayed, or duplicated, so improvement targets the right spots. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. | When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 1-4 Wochen | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 1-6 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Process Map, Handoff List, Improvement Backlog | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary | Starfish Board, Practice Changes, Experiments |
Tagsno overlap | ProcessOperationsImprovement | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation | RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
