methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Problem Interview
Product Discovery
Problem Interview
Independent contributions form an ordered group priority list.
Facilitation
Nominal Group Technique
Paper illustration for Solution Interview
Product Discovery
Solution Interview
Purposedifferent
When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution.When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting.When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation.
Complexitysame
MediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
30-60 min je Interview60-120 min30-60 min je Interview
Participantsdifferent
5-12 Interviews5-125-10 Interviews
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer SegmentsRanked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group PrioritySolution Feedback, Objection List, Validation Notes
Tagsno overlap
DiscoveryInterviewsValidation
FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion
ValidationInterviewsPrototype
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Paper illustration for 1-2-4-All.
Facilitation
1-2-4-All
Paper illustration for Concierge MVP
Product Discovery
Concierge MVP
A paper-based illustration representing Design Sprint with its core stages and visible working result.
Innovation
Design Sprint