View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Problem Interview | ![]() Product Discovery MVP Test Matrix | ![]() Architecture Architecture Inception Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution. | When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan. | The Architecture Inception Canvas bundles the first architecture questions into a compact decision picture. It fits when an initiative is still in motion but still needs clear guardrails. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 45-75 min | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 2-8 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments | Test Matrix, Test Plan | Inception Canvas, Risks, Goal List, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | DiscoveryInterviewsValidation | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions | AlignmentArchitectureCanvas |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






