View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Problem Interview |  Product Discovery MVP Test Matrix |  Growth A/B Testing |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution. | When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 45-75 min | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 2-8 | 1-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments | Test Matrix, Test Plan | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary |
Tags1 shared | DiscoveryInterviewsValidation | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
