View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Planning Poker |  Team Design Team API |  Facilitation Power Interest Grid |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. | When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document. | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 2-5 min je Item | Half day initial, dann laufend | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-9 | Ein Team plus Stakeholder | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates | Team API Document | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam | TeamAlignmentCommunicationService | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
