View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Planning Poker |  Operations Getting Things Done |  Agile Affinity Estimation |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. | With many open commitments and ideas in daily life, a reliable external storage system emerges. The method relieves the mind so priority and context don't have to compete in memory. | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 2-5 min je Item | 1-2 h Setup, laufend | 30-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-9 | 1 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates | Action Lists, Project List, Review Routine | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam | ProductivityPlanningTasksExecution | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
