View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Personas |  Facilitation Mind Mapping |  Product Discovery Opportunity Interview |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When target groups stay too vague and teams talk about the same people differently, personas create a shared, solid picture of usage. Condensed profiles make needs, contexts, and differences tangible enough for decisions. | When a topic is still unclear and too many thoughts surface at once, Mind Mapping creates an open surface for ordering them. It makes connections, subtopics, and starting points visible without fixing them too early. | When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Tage | 15-45 min | 30-60 min je Interview |
Participantsdifferent | Internes Team | 1-10 | 5-12 Interviews |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Persona Profiles, Needs Summary, Scenario Notes | Mind Map, Topic Clusters, Open Questions | Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes |
Tagsno overlap | ResearchCustomerSynthesis | BrainstormingIdeasMappingStructureFacilitation | DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
