View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring |  UX Research Personas |  Product Discovery Kano Model |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. | When target groups stay too vague and teams talk about the same people differently, personas create a shared, solid picture of usage. Condensed profiles make needs, contexts, and differences tangible enough for decisions. | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 1-3 Tage | 1-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | Internes Team | 10-50 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes | Persona Profiles, Needs Summary, Scenario Notes | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes |
Tagsno overlap | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds | ResearchCustomerSynthesis | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
