View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring | ![]() Product Discovery Opportunity Solution Tree | ![]() Decision Making Risk Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. | When discovery keeps swinging between goals, ideas, and learning loops, it creates clear steering logic. It connects the desired outcome, opportunities, and experiments into a legible structure. | When a project faces many possible disruptions, it quickly becomes unclear which risks deserve attention first. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Risk Matrix and a Top Risk List. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 1-2 h Setup, laufend | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 2-6 | 3-10 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes | Opportunity Solution Tree, Experiment Backlog, Learning Log | Risk Matrix, Top Risk List |
Tagsno overlap | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds | DiscoveryOutcomesExperimentsOpportunity | RiskDecisionPrioritizationAssessment |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






