View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring | ![]() UX Research Customer Journey Mapping | ![]() Product Discovery Jobs to Be Done |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. | When a user journey falls apart across many touchpoints, customer journey mapping makes the experience visible as a coherent arc. Phases, emotions, and breaks become legible enough to prioritize critical moments deliberately. | When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 2-4 h | 1-3 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 4-10 | 5-12 Interviews |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes | Journey Map, Pain-point List, Opportunity Backlog | Job Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity List |
Tagsno overlap | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds | JourneyServiceService design | CustomerOutcomesNeeds |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






