View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring | ![]() Operations Getting Things Done | ![]() Product Strategy Impact Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. | With many open commitments and ideas in daily life, a reliable external storage system emerges. The method relieves the mind so priority and context don't have to compete in memory. | When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 1-2 h Setup, laufend | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 1 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes | Action Lists, Project List, Review Routine | Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery Options |
Tagsno overlap | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds | ProductivityPlanningTasksExecution | OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






