View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  UX Design Lean UX Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | The Lean UX Canvas helps clarify user behavior, touchpoints, and concept decisions. It makes assumptions and desired outcomes visible and captures the result as a completed canvas, hypothesis list, and first experiment. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 15-45 min | 2-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 1-3 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Completed Lean UX Canvas, Hypothesis list, First experiment |
Tagsno overlap | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | CanvasHypothesisOutcomesDiscovery |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
