View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Opportunity Interview |  Agile Specification by Example |  Product Discovery Dual-Track Agile |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | When uncertainty and delivery run in parallel, it separates learning work from implementation while keeping both connected. It prevents unvalidated ideas from falling directly into the delivery stream. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 60-90 min pro Feature | Laufend, Wochen bis Monate |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 3-6 | 4-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Discovery Backlog, Delivery Backlog, Experiment-Ergebnisse, Validierte Stories |
Tagsno overlap | DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | AgileDiscoveryDelivery |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
