methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Opportunity Interview
Product Discovery
Opportunity Interview
Independent contributions form an ordered group priority list.
Facilitation
Nominal Group Technique
Purposedifferent
When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities.When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting.
Complexitysame
MediumMedium
Timedifferent
30-60 min je Interview60-120 min
Participantsdifferent
5-12 Interviews5-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer QuotesRanked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority
Tagsno overlap
DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer
FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Paper illustration for 1-2-4-All.
Facilitation
1-2-4-All
Paper illustration of Hypothesis Prioritization Canvas with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
Hypothesis Prioritization Canvas
A paper-based illustration representing Kano Model with its core stages and visible working result.
Product Discovery
Kano Model