View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Opportunity Interview |  Domain Modeling EventStorming |  Knowledge Modeling Concept Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities. | When a domain consists of many events, rules, and states, it creates a shared modeling space for the team. It bundles language, flows, and boundaries before domain knowledge fragments into siloed views. | Concept Mapping arranges terms and relationships in a network that makes subject-matter connections tangible. It fits when a topic needs to be understood structurally rather than linearly. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 2-8 h | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 5-12 | 1-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes | Event Timeline, Ubiquitous Language, Boundaries, Open Questions | Concept Map, Relationship Labels, Knowledge Gaps |
Tagsno overlap | DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer | Domain-Driven DesignEventsDiscoveryWorkshop | KnowledgeConceptsMappingSensemaking |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
