View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Opportunity Interview |  Innovation Design Sprint |  UX Research Usability Testing |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities. | When the product question is unclear and time pressure is high, the method takes a team from an open idea to a testable solution. It connects problem understanding, decision, and learning in one compact format, lowering the risk of spending a lot of energy on a mere guess. | When a product is built but people get stuck on tasks, usability testing shows the friction at concrete points. Observed use instead of self-report makes visible where orientation, understanding, or interaction breaks down. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 4-5 Tage | 1-2 h je Session |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 5-8 | Based on research question |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes | Prototype, Test Findings, Decision Rationale | Usability Issues, Severity List, Recommendations |
Tagsno overlap | DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer | Design sprintPrototypeValidationInnovation | ValidationUXPrototype |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
