View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Opportunity Interview | ![]() Decision Making Delphi Method | ![]() Product Discovery Hypothesis Prioritization Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities. | When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together. | When many hypotheses compete for attention, it brings order to their learning sequence and importance. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a prioritization canvas and a hypothesis backlog. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 1-4 Wochen | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 6-30 Experten | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes | Expert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption Notes | Prioritization Canvas, Hypothesis Backlog |
Tagsno overlap | DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer | ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy | ExperimentsPrioritizationDiscoveryHypothesis |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






