View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Opportunity Interview |  Decision Making Assumption Surfacing |  Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities. | Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it. | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min je Interview | 45-90 min | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 2-8 | 3-6 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes | Assumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning Plan | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes |
Tags1 shared | DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer | AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
