View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |  Delivery RAID Log |  Facilitation Power Interest Grid |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
