View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery MVP Test Matrix | ![]() Operations PDCA Cycle | ![]() Product Discovery Fake Door Test |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan. | For an improvement that still has to prove itself in everyday work, the method runs it through small learning loops. It connects planning, checking, and standardization into a repeatable learning mode. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-75 min | 1 h bis mehrere Wochen | 1-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 1-8 | Nutzertraffic |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Test Matrix, Test Plan | PDCA Log, Experiment Plan, Learning Outcome, Standard Change | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision |
Tags1 shared | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions | Continuous improvementLeanExperiments | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






