View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery MVP Test Matrix |  Product Discovery Fake Door Test |  Agile Example Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-75 min | 1-5 Tage | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | Nutzertraffic | 3-7 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Test Matrix, Test Plan | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
