View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Mind Mapping |  Facilitation Delegation Poker |  Facilitation Open Space Technology |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a topic is still unclear and too many thoughts surface at once, Mind Mapping creates an open surface for ordering them. It makes connections, subtopics, and starting points visible without fixing them too early. | When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice. | When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 15-45 min | 45-90 min | 0.5-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 1-10 | 3-10 | 20-500+ |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Mind Map, Topic Clusters, Open Questions | Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements | Session Marketplace, Proceedings, Action Topics |
Tagsno overlap | BrainstormingIdeasMappingStructureFacilitation | AutonomyRolesTeam | FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
