View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Systems Thinking Leverage Points |  UX Research Contextual Inquiry |  Systems Thinking Future Reality Tree |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy. | When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise. | A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | Half day | 1-3 Wochen | 2-4 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 4-12 Beobachtungen | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Leverage Map, Action Strategy | Field Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain Points | Future Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved Injections |
Tagsno overlap | Systems thinkingChangeStrategy | UX researchObservationContext | Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
