View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations Learning Review |  Agile Start Stop Continue |  Innovation Contradiction Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | After a project phase with mixed results, the method makes learning from the individual case reusable. It connects events, decisions, and systemic conditions into robust insights. | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. | When a system should improve while another measure suffers as a result, the method makes the underlying conflict precisely formulable. It separates the desired effect from its side effect. This makes solutions possible that address the contradiction deliberately instead of half-heartedly. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 30-60 min | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 3-12 | 2-8 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Learning Review Notes, System Factors, Improvement Actions | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions | Contradiction Statement, Abstraction Notes, Solution Principles, Concept Ideas |
Tagsno overlap | LearningRetrospectiveIncidentOperations | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection | ContradictionsInnovationProblem solving |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
